A Confluence of Philanthropaths
The Limits to Their Growth and The Why's Behind The Lies
(Update 2023-11-05 21:28: Video screenshot below updated due to typo)
NB: Accompanying videos CLICK HERE - links in description for videos 2,3,4,5 and 6!
This will be a painful post for many, for ignorance can be bliss.
It will be uncomfortable for all, it will be unbelievable to some and it will be uncensored - for now.
If you’d like to view the videos for this post, please see:
If you're stuck for time, let me give you the cliff notes:
There is a predatory, psychopathic and parasitic mindset among the powers that be - epitomised by "The Philanthropaths".
Their world view has been shaped through generations.
They believe they are the righteous rulers of the world.
They are positioning the implementation of a one world government.
They believe there are too many people on the planet.
They say the man made climate crisis is the problem but they know the real problem is an energy crisis.
They are using the reported climate crisis as their biggest weapon in their compliance arsenal.
They are using Net Zero to push for the last and greatest wealth transfer the world has ever seen from the populace to themselves.
They know Net Zero is ridiculous given the mined metals required would take thousands of years to do so, yes I did say thousands of years.
They know the energy needed to create renewable alternatives to fossil fuels must be generated from... fossil fuels.
There is hope for the future, you are part of that hope and I will give you the tools for change.
The world we live in is at a tipping point. Democracy - as generally understood has flatlined.
Many people still believe however, their vote counts for something.
The reality of the 'democratic apparatus' is your vote - once every 4 or 5 years or so counts for nothing.
This is evidenced neatly in the Netflix 2017 documentary "Saving Capitalism" presented by Robert Reich- a fascinating watch by the way - at 47:20 into the documentary, Reich talks of a research report conducted over a 20 year period by Northwestern and Princeton universities (See the report and the report analysis
for the into how much political power ordinary citizens had.
They concluded in their own words:
'The preferences of the average American appear to have only a miniscule near zero statistically non significant impact upon public policy'"
Even the BBC - that paragon of biased reporting - called out the United States as an oligarchy rather than a democracy back in 2014. Obviously the concept applies to the UK, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Ireland etc...
In other words, we live in a world controlled and abused by a very small number of people.
And those people do not think like you and I. They have an entirely different take on what the world of tomorrow should look like.
From the dawn of time, humanity has been struggling with the dynamics of equality and fairness.
We have come so far only because of societal cooperation but, not all cooperation is made equal, in particular "forced cooperation".
In other words - coercion. The violence of silence.
This form of societal compliance has indeed been achieved through violence - be it the overt act of wielding a sword or a gun through to the more recent velvet glove covered mace known as legal mandates.
Always remember
"Legality does not equate to morality, the law is not a moral compass"
You'll often hear the language of "there is consensus" - be it a legal/medical or expert context - to justify any mandates or "follow the rules" diktats.
The ruling class (or as they would like to be thought of - the 'elites') have historically risen to power through coercive means.
Royal families throughout the world exist only because their forebears literally had the killer instinct.
Those in power today, particularly those with real power - working from the shadows rather than being talking heads on TV - also have that killer instinct.
The biggest example of this writ large is the incessant series of wars across the globe exacting terrible carnage, rarely seen on our TV screens (unless a particular political point is to be progressed - or indeed to distract the proletariat like a magician "Look over there, nothing to see here...").
All the while, those in the shadows exerting real power further consolidate their position from the profits made.
Literally through making a killing.
Make no mistake, those in power find it intoxicating and one should always remember the old adage:
"Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely"
Right now, we are in fact being corralled into a dystopian technocratic future by poly-idealistic parasitic psychopatic predators (see Mr Global has many names - The PeePees in the ProjectBubbleBurst Vault) who believe it is their birthright to exert and extend power indefinitely over us - the cattle, the serfs, the little people.
At their epicenter are "The Philanthropaths" - kudos to Neil Oliver for my first encounter of the portmanteau. Indeed this article title was inspired by the phrase “A Confluence of Opportunity” - from a Bret Weinstein podcast. Bret recently called the same cadre out as ‘Goliath’ with
on the must watch Darkhorse interview on the inhuman attacks in Israel:
The Philanthropaths are a subset of the power 'elite' in this world - they are billionaire 'philanthropists' who have setup corporate entities which appear 'charitable' at face value and in reality do very little good except to further increase the wealth of those signalling hollow virtue.
For a spot on analysis of Philanthropaths, check out Anatomy of a Philanthropath by Margaret Anna Alice.
If you'd like a more detailed introduction to 3 of their ilk, I can highly recommend the following reads by Karen Harradine:
And do subscribe to Karen's work, she is a writing force of nature - whether you agree with her or not, she is guaranteed to raise your eyebrows!
The foundations and trusts setup by the philanthropaths are vehicles of power acquisition and transmission.
They are a large driving force of the "NGO Industrial Complex" by the way.
And what is crucial to the continued Philanthropathic power?
Well, literally power - the energy kind in the form and lack of fossil fuels. Yes I did say lack.
These predators do not all have the same dark satanic ideals and agenda some believe they may have.
But their goals align, as do their beliefs and modus operandi.
This is indeed a confluence of psychopathic opportunity.
The truth is, we are not in a climate crisis.
Now before you switch off and think I am a climate change denier, hold your horses. The climate is indeed turbulent, man has had a hand in at least some of the change but this is not a climate crisis, it is however, a man made crisis nonetheless for in inverted commas "good reason".
And herein lies the rub.
Whether a climate crisis is true or not - what the powers that be believe is we will not be able to extract the necessary fossil fuels to further pollute our planet and our atmosphere.
We are running out of oil - not because there isn't enough in the ground, but because we have not invested enough into finding new reserves or extracting the dwindling supplies from existing fields.
And to compound the problem, there has not been anywhere near enough investment in technologies such as nuclear to wean us off our gargantuan greed for fossil fuels.
What Just Stop Oil and their brethren do not realise is the taps are already running dry.
Btw - when it comes to term "climate crisis consensus", contrary to the journaliars within the media - there is none.
At this point in this post, there will be an outflux of readers/viewers conditioned to reflexively and reductively use the term #ConspiracyTheorist even before we get to the meat of the matter.
If that was your gut reaction and your hackles are up, please soldier on and when you have digested all of the following, let rip in the comments - if you still feel the need.
On with the why behind the lie...
I first grokked' 'the truth' in 2022 - largely through the works of Dr Chris Martenson and his excellent series of videos The Crash Course
(I highly recommend you get a copy of his physical book btw - The Crash Course Book.)
As good a teacher as Chris is, a crucial point only came home to roost in the nooks and crannies of my own neurons when I recently read some of the work of Gail Tverberg and Jacob Nordangård.
We have a world where the majority have been conditioned to believe the false narrative of the #ClimateCrisis and equally on the other side of the scales, there are a much smaller cohort who adamantly believe there is no such thing as #Climate/Change.
The truth lies somewhere in between but also at right angles...
Without getting bogged down in the mire of disputing the #ClimateCrisis, I can find common ground by saying we are having an anthropogenic effect on the planet. We are not good environmental stewards and our past pollution footprint has been woeful.
If you'd like to find out more about why we don't have a climate crisis, I can recommend the excellent book “False Alarm - "How Climate Change Panic Cost Us Trillions” by Dr Bjorn Lomborg and also, do dive into the excellent works of The Ethical Skeptic, specifically The Climate Change Alternative We Ignore (to Our Peril.
And just like those financial adverts you hear, past energy outputs are not indicative of the future. Models too often assume a continuance of the status quo. But we are approaching an historic inflexion point…
NB: Energy prices do not follow normal supply and demand curves simply because the black gold which is crude oil fuels both the supply AND the demand of our collective economic endeavours.
Pretty much every possession you own, all the food you consume and the water you drink has had oil involved in production.
So if we don't have a #ClimateCrisis, what do we have?
What we have is an #EnergyCrisis. It is the most important issue facing us but it is not the only crisis as we shall see.
These crises are largely due to the orchestrated madness of current day political policies brought to us by...
A Confluence of Philanthropaths.
They have caused the problems through their generational greed for wealth and power and now the party is coming to an end, they are pulling the strings in the background (but barely obscured) to show the world their preferred new world order - The Great Reset and the UN Agenda 2030 with their sustainable development goals.
In terms of global understanding, it was well put in the film Cool Hand Luke: "What we've got here is failure to communicate" - largely due to censorious technocratic interests.
The big lie we are being told is our continued use of fossil fuels will result in irreversible climate change.
The truth behind the lie is we will likely not be able to extract enough of the remaining fossil fuel reserves left on the planet to cause a climate crisis - even if those dreaded carbon emissions are causal.
Instead of sweltering heat in the future, the majority of the industrial world will face a bleak, cold and bitter future.
Indeed, cold kills far more people than heat each and every year, but you won't hear that on the news - because it's not novel and thus not new-sssss.
There is debate as to whether we do indeed have several decades of oil reserves still untapped in the ground but the current oil wells which are pumping today are running out at faster and faster rates.
All the cheap oil we have benefitted from has been produced and the real powers that be have been influenced by this for generations.
Call them what you will, the elites, the cabal, the globalists, the party, the technocrats or call them by their actions 'Parasitic Pyschopathic Predators'. Or as I like to take the piss out of them (for they don't like parody) " The PeePees", I'll stick with the term Philanthropaths moving forward so you don't piss yourself laughing too often ;-).
When I say the term Philanthropaths henceforth, it will also act as a shorthand for their controlled minions like captains of industry and of course the political class unless I clarify otherwise by context.
They know the truth, oil is dwindling with current production capabilities at a rapid rate and tapping the reserves remaining in the ground is time consuming and extraordinarily expensive.
From discovery to production, a new oil well can take 10 years or more to come online. Investment in these new wells has not been what you might think as even though prices have been high for consumers, the prices in the last decade or more have not been high enough for the oil companies to have invested sufficiently into research and development.
Institutional shareholders exhibit Mr Magoo myopia and want immediate profits. Short term, self-centered and sadly lacking in foresight.
The situation we are in right now is a direct result of the greed of previous generations kicking the can down the road.
We're not quite at the end of the road yet but we are close.
This is why you are seeing the acceleration of totalitarianism, the UN Agenda 2030, the WEF "You'll own nothing and you'll be happy" trope, the WHO totalitarian control in the event of a new pandemic, the introduction of digital id's and Central Bank Digital Currencies, the 15 minute city and low traffic neighbourhoods and the dystopian social credit system already in China and coming to a neighbourhood near you soon - if they get their way.
Or as Oliver Anthony so emotively put it:
These rich men north of Richmond
Lord knows they all just wanna have total control
Wanna know what you think, wanna know what you do
And they don't think you know, but I know that you do
These blatant choke points on freedom are simply because the world as we know it is not going to be the same in 10 years time.
They have told us there will not be a return to the 'old normal' and instead you may have heard the slogan "Build Back Better" once, twice or three thousand times over the last few years.
Speaking of choke points, it would appear Operation Choke Point 2.0 has indeed been launched by the Biden administration to take up where Obama left off and try in this instance to destroy the Crypto industry.
Interesting to see how when an egalitarian decentralised financial system threatens the status quo, the status quo empire strikes back.
For more information on this, take a look at the Chokepoint 2.0 Confirmed
video from Kim Iversen.
Our political class have failed us and failed us utterly. In fact, they have sold us into abject slavery.
Only a few of these so called 'leaders' understand the peril we are in, the vast majority are followers who like the populace have swallowed the lie and beg for more "NetZero me harder Daddy".
Those who do know have worked in the background with the psychopathic predators to use the #ClimateCrisis as a backdrop to hide the issue of our running out of energy in the near future.
From Turdeau [sic] to Tedros
Which of the following would be more palatable to the populace, can you imagine Justin Turdeau coming to a podium and presenting the following:
"Here's the truth, we are running out of our ability to extract fossil fuels. There may be enough in the ground for many more decades but we can't get to it quickly enough now due to our mismanagement and greed.
You, not us, will have food and fuel shortages in the coming months and years. Society cannot be sustained at current levels and I'm sorry to say - no I'm not sorry actually as I have known this for some time - many of you will go hungry, starve and die after living a bleak existence in ever increasing fear.
Expect rolling blackouts, restrictions in travel, social unrest and rioting.
Expect further wars due to dwindling fossil fuel resources so we can point the blame on others and we do expect you to provide your sons and daughters as canon fodder to die btw.
Whilst this unravels, we will buy up the farms and tightly control food production systems whilst pretending to solve the problem of 'The Climate Crisis' at COP28, 29 and 30 and for good measure, we'll arrive by helicopter and/or private jet as we like to rub it in and take the piss.
We'll enforce digital identities and CBDCs so you will be totally enslaved but sell it to you as being able to control your own carbon footprint. We do indeed have a war on carbon, but the carbon is you.
Of course we'll keep you and your children distracted through incessant fearmongering - watch out for that new pandemic.
Tedros will tell you all about it!"
Or is the following perhaps more palatable:
"We need to transition to a fossil fuel free economy to reach NetZero. We face an existential threat due to our continued use of fossil fuels and the Climate Crisis. To reduce carbon emissions, we are introducing low traffic neighbourhoods, 15 minute cities and other measures such as Digital IDs and Central Bank Digital currencies.
These initiatives will generate thousands of new jobs, make your day to day activities much more convenient and you will be able to control your own carbon footprint and help save the planet one transaction at a time. Isn't it right you do your fair share to save the planet?"
So, the truth is being obscured purposefully.
One thing is clear, there is no singular Plato 'Noble Lie' at play here. I believe it to be more Machiavellian in scope.
So why won't we be able to continue the status quo we have known for several generations?
Klaus Schwab, some would call 'seer' or 'soothsayer', I for alliterative and illuminative purposes call him - charlatan - has foretold in his extraordinarily quick to market book "The Great Reset" back in mid-2020:
"At the time of writing (June 2020), the pandemic continues to worsen globally. Many of us are pondering when things will return to normal. The short response is: never. Nothing will ever return to the “broken” sense of normalcy that prevailed prior to the crisis because the coronavirus pandemic marks a fundamental inflection point in our global trajectory." - Klaus Schwab
Extraordinary.
So there will be no new normal according to the World Economic Forum ideologues, their vision is dystopian where the stakeholder economy is one of corporations, institutional investors and non governmental organisations - not people like me, nor people like you.
They are right though in terms of things being very different. I foresee a better future for humanity but to get there, there will be tough times in the next 5 to 10 years in particular.
Let's talk a little more about why we face an energy crisis.
The Exponential Function
There is a fascinating presentation by the late Dr Albert A Bartlett called Arithmetic, Population and Energy
In it, he rightly espouses our inability to grasp the implications of the mathematical exponential function.
The implications taken to the extreme are portrayed in the film Inferno with the billionaire transhumanist (portrayed by Ben Foster) who is hell bent on a Thanos like culling of the earth's population in order to save humanity - and of course the earth.
A true Greeniac.
Remember - when you hear The Philanthropaths talking about saving humanity, they are talking about themselves and a controllable worker/serf class, they are not talking about those they perceive as a threat to their natural resources and reign of power.
And if you'd like a more contemporary explanation of the implications of The Exponential Function, take a look at this recent video release: Exploring the Long-Term Implications for the Economy, Population, Natural Resources, and Debt
from Dr Chris Martenson.
As per the excellent article "When The Economy Gets Squeezed by Too Little Energy from Gail Tverberg, the world's economy is a physics-based self-organising system.
As Gail says:
"Such economies grow for years, but ultimately they collapse" - Gail Tverberg
In other words, our economy is governed by The Second Law of Thermodynamics - Entropy
It is a dissipative structure.
Or put more simply - it is too big and it will fail.
The Philanthropaths know this, this is why they are extracting as much power and wealth as they can and why they tell you "You will own nothing and be happy".
Isn't it funny with a little critical thinking you can conclude "So, if I own nothing, who will own everything, you?"
We have a hugely complex and interconnected global economy. This level of complexity - without constant management and update (which requires energy) will tend to collapse.
We've already seen supply chains impacted from the Pandemic response and remember how big an impact just one errant ship made - the Ever Given - caused in the Suez canal in 2021?
What could possibly go wrong if we're running out of key fossil fuel resources I wonder...
In 1956 M King Hubbert published the seminal paper Nuclear Energy and The Fossil Fuels.
As can be seen from the graph, it neatly depicted the finite resource we have in fossil fuels and the need for nuclear energy investment in order for an orderly energy source transition to occur.
We now have the benefit of hindsight and know nuclear is nowhere near where it should be in the chart depicted, it hasn't even gone past the 'R' on the Y-Axis.
So now you know
So now you know the why behind the lies - at least my understanding of the complex web of deceit - the motive for mass myopia, the build back better bollocks.
Let's take a look at their means, motives and opportunities and remember!
Watch out for the next pandemic!
The Financial Crisis - The Economy
The current financial crisis is of course another big issue we face at a global level - and as everything is connected to everything else, the energy crisis is primary and financial crisis secondary but interconnected.
I'm not going to get into the existential threat Artificial Intelligence poses lest I be writing forever...
The Dollar as the global reserve currency may soon well be dead in the water
and the unsustainable levels of debt across the globe more than $300 Trillion in 2021 means the great Central Bank led banking ponzi schemes are close to collapse.
Those in the know are well aware and the manipulation of interest rates and in particular the unprecedented increases have been designed to put in place the final transfer of fiat based wealth in history from the many to the few.
We've already seen the greatest transfer of wealth in history take place when Jerome Powell cranked open the printing presses yet again in 2020 and Philanthropaths destroyed the middle classes and their businesses.
The Mystery of Inflation
Inflation is a hidden in plain sight tax.
We are taught to believe it is this highly complex financial symptom/reaction to various monetary and fiscal policies. Inscrutable to the average person, understandable only to the sainted order of economists.
It is instead the dilution of value in your dollar or pound by the creation of... more dollars or pounds.
To add insult to injury, during this process of monetary creation, the powers that be have the game rigged so they are able to utilise the new money supply, taking a little off the top for themselves before the true watered down value is felt by the rest of the economic system.
Ludwig von Mises - a 20th Century economist put it this way:
“Prices are going up because there is an additional quantity of money, asking, searching for a not-increased quantity of commodities. And the newspapers or the theorists call the higher prices, “inflation.” But the inflation is not the higher prices; the inflation is the new money pumped into the market. It is this new money that then inflates the prices.”
In 1835, US President Andrew Jackson declared his disdain for the international bankers:
“You are a den of vipers. I intend to rout you out, and by the Eternal God I will rout you out. If the people only understood the rank injustice of our money and banking system, there would be a revolution before morning.”
Funnily enough, there followed an (unsuccessful) assassination attempt on President Jackson’s life. Jackson had told his vice president, Martin Van Buren:
“The bank, Mr. Van Buren, is trying to kill me.”
Funnier still how big business and the Philanthropaths increased their wealth to unprecedented levels over the last few years.
I'm not laughing, are you?
The current financial system is a rigged game, it's apparatus and associated apparatchicks is a scam designed to steal.
Now, a rhetorical question for you to ponder - What would happen if the majority of people were forced to be reliant on the state for basic necessities such as food and shelter, would they be more compliant as a result?
The Mindset - The Predominant Lens of Lack
As I write this, the year is 2023 - we have witnessed extreme interventions in society during the pandemic response.
We have seen political 'leaders' - such as Justin Trudeau and Jacinda Ardern acting as tyrants and attempting to 'other' their fellow citizens who would not comply to their diktats - echoes of Nazism and the Untermenschen.
We have witnessed abuses of power too numerous to mention and highlight here but I will say this. If we - collectively - do not become alerted to the imminent threat we face, we will witness many more abuses of power and ultimately become the abused.
Every time you or I comply with a legal but immoral diktat, we put a brick into the walls of our children's jails.
So, what is really happening, what is the plan?
Well, before we look into 'the plan', we need to understand the mindset of the most influential currently in power - or at the very least have an appreciation of the thinking as getting into their heads might be a tad on the dark side.
The Second World War was a stain on soul of humanity, the holocaust should always be remembered as should all the other atrocities conducted during the war.
Nazi Germany - or at least a small but powerful and influential cabal - believed themselves to be morally, intellectually and physically superior. The Jews were seen as Untermenschen, sub-human - as were others who were deemed inferior.
There are certainly parallels to be drawn to the world of 2023!
Philanthropaths and their propaganda minions have a stranglehold in the media on the moral high ground preaching atop a hillock in hell.
At the heart of this evil was Eugenics.
Can you imagine a world where only perfect physical specimens are allowed?
They can, and either do not care or suffer from myopia.
People like Helen Keller or Stephen Hawking would not be born in the future they desire.
The reality is of course there is no such thing as a perfect human being, physically, morally or spiritually.
For sure though, all of these people look upon the populace as a problem, one to be managed and controlled.
Which brings me to an organisation that many people would instantly respond to with the Pavlovian response "You're a conspiracy theorist".
The Club of Rome - yes, it sounds like it could easily be part of a Bond film. I can see a gathering of local Italian Spectre agents whenever I hear the organisation's name but it does indeed exist and their raison d'etre from their own website states:
The Club of Rome is a platform of diverse thought leaders who identify holistic solutions to complex global issues and promote policy initiatives and action to enable humanity to emerge from multiple planetary emergencies.
The organisation has prioritised five key areas of impact: Emerging New Civilisations; Planetary Emergency; Reframing Economics; Rethinking Finance; and Youth Leadership and Intergenerational Dialogues. - https://www.clubofrome.org/about-us/
This all sounds very altruistic but the problem with such altruism is
Who are the characters involved?
What is the knowledge they possess?
What are their true intentions?
What right have they to make decisions on a global scale - did you give them authority?
The list could go on of course and there are certainly parallels to another self-appointed grandiose organisation called the World Economic Forum - WEF.
Without going down any deep rabbit holes, let's examine one of those questions above:
- What is the knowledge they possess?
Let's wind the clock back to 1972, a report commissioned by The Club of Rome was created by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology - MIT. It was entitled The Limits to Growth.
This report has been highly influential in the thinking of the ruling class and has shaped both the United Nations Agenda 2021 and Agenda 2030 visions and goals for the future.
Unfortunately, the report painted a very stark and dire picture of the future.
We've previously seen from the works of Dr Albert A Bartlett, Gail Tverberg and Dr Chris Martenson how depletion of resources be it fossil fuels or raw materials for the economy are of material importance to our continued standard of living.
But, herein lies the rub, this lens of lack is perhaps the best explainer why The Philanthropaths pursue their current agenda - Agenda 2030.
The race to net zero is a race to the bottom and a tragedy of the commons and the means they currently employ to reach their goals are indeed utilitarian.
The battle cry oft heard on the streets "We are the 99%", the reality is we are more like the 99.9999% - for every one of (by some estimates) "the 8000", there are 1 million of us.
We, the 99.9999% - our lives but numbers on spreadsheets, our views irrelevant, our existence - til now - a necessary evil...
We outnumber them by a million to one. They see our magnitude as a physical and existential threat.
Perhaps the biggest influence in terms of this lens of lack many of the Philanthropaths view the world through their Philantropathic Periscopes is the 1972 published work by MIT for the Club of Rome - The Limits to Growth.
In this seminal tome, a bleak picture of society is painted due to over-population and scarcity of resources. There is no doubt we are living on a finite planet but take heart.
There are certainly contrarian views to the bleak desolate picture depicted by The Limits to Growth and you should always keep an eye on The Extinction Clock which dutifully tells us just how many apocalyptic prophecies have come to pass - hint if you're reading or watching this, it's still none.
Indeed, for all those who still believe we are about to be boiled alive, even Jim Skea, the new head of the UN's IPCC, said:
It's not helpful to imply that a temperature rise of 1.5 degrees Celsius is an existential threat to humanity. - Jim Skea
Back to the lens of lack - a lack of resources isn't the problem we currently face - the Philanthropaths have mismanaged the resources we have and those we have left.
In terms of the man made energy crises we have started to feel the brunt of, they are likely to continue for years to come unless some miraculous discovery - or should I say re-discovery - of Nikolai Tesla's work in the realm of free energy comes to light, or Stanley Meyer's water powered engine or the aliens bequeath us anti-gravity technology and perpetual energy.
Don't hold your breath though even with all the UFO revelations coming from the US Congress.
Parasitic Psychopathic Predators
When you hear the term 'psychopath', what's the first image to spring to mind. Is it Hannibal Lecter, Ted Bundy or perhaps Jimmy Saville?
Well, psychopathic traits are not bad per se on their own - but when taken to the extreme, they have lethal consequences.
And not all of the Philanthropaths and their lieutenants are necessarily psychopathic, as so darkly and beautifully put by the following Aleksander Solzhenitsyn quotations:
Quotation 1:
"To do evil a human being must first of all believe that what he's doing is good...
Ideology - that is what gives evildoing its long-sought justification and gives the evildoer the necessary steadfastness and determination.
That is the social theory which helps to make his acts seem good instead of bad in his own and others' eyes, so that he won't hear reproaches and curses but will receive praise and honours"
Quotation 2:
“If only it were all so simple! If only there were evil people somewhere insidiously committing evil deeds, and it were necessary only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them. But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?”
― Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago 1918–1956
Whenever you hear the expression "The Greater Good", your ears should prick up and pay attention. Some of the worst atrocities have been justified as for "The Greater Good".
To wrap your head around The Psychology of Psychopaths, I can recommend starting with The Academy of Ideas
I have a lifetime membership with them and I can tell you it's worth every penny.
So let's take a look at what makes these people - The Philanthropaths - tick.
Some of their ideologies...
The Ideologies
Ideology 1 - Belief in their own right to rule
Let's take a look at the Rockefellers for a start, a family dynasty of unimaginable wealth and a belief system instilled into them for generations.
They are better than us, it is their own right to rule.
Quoting from their Special Studies Project report "The Mid-Century Challenge to U.S. Foreign Policy " in 1959....
We cannot escape, and indeed should welcome, the task which history has imposed on us.
This is the task of helping to shape a new world order in all its dimensions—spiritual, economic, political, social.
or how about the doozy from the 1961 Rockefeller Panel Reports. The Rockefeller brothers had written that they
“could not escape the task that history had assigned” to them – a task that meant “helping to shape a new world order in all its dimensions.”
But that was many years ago I hear you say. Well, the ideology remains and their actions continue to move the needle in a dark direction.
I cannot recommend highly enough the book Rockefeller Controlling The Game by Jacob Nordangård
to understand the mindset of The Philanthropaths - it is not just the Rockefellers however.
They have been extraordinarily industrious shaping the future over the past century and more worryingly, they have influenced the beliefs and values of several generations and the current crop of Philanthropaths. I'm not picking on them per se but they are a family name almost all have heard of and their past and continued influence has been and is huge.
Imagine having an NGO which shows other Philanthropaths how best to invest in "Humanitarian" initiatives.
Imagine not, ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS does the job nicely.
Ideology 2 - Internationalism
When you hear the term Internationalism - what springs to your mind? I am still somewhat infected by ideas of peace and good will to all men with all nations working together cooperatively.
Goes to show you, propaganda runs deep.
It is however something entirely different. Back to the Rockefellers for a moment and this gem from David Rockefeller's memoir published in 2003:
Some even believe we the Rockefeller family are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure— One World, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it. - David Rockefeller
What David omitted from "One World" was the term government - "One World Government". This is the goal of organisations like The Trilateral Commission and the World Economic Forum to mention but a few.
Right now, we have a nascent role model in place - and it is called "The G20".
Ideology 3 - Neo-Malthusian
The Philanthropaths have a strong belief the world is over populated.
They believe in the need for depopulation - initiatives and terms like:
Planned Parenthood
Sterilisation
Birth Control
Population Control
Family planning
Genetics, and last but not least
Transhumanism
are all used to describe their belief in the need for depopulation.
Here's a couple of pertinent quotes to ponder - the first from an interview with Maurice Strong (Member of The Club of Rome & Secretary General of The 1992 Rio Conference) in 1992 about the plot of a book he wanted to write:
What if a small group of world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the Earth comes from the actions of the rich countries? And if the world is to survive, those rich countries would have to sign an agreement reducing their impact on the environment. Will they do it? The group's conclusion is 'no'. The rich countries won't do it. They won't change. So, in order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn't it our responsibility to bring that about? - https://libquotes.com/maurice-strong/quote/lby8o5x - Maurice Strong
Hullo, hullo - what do we have here? Net Zero... Hmmm....
The second quote from an interview in 1988 with Prince Philip where he said:
> “In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, to contribute something to solving overpopulation.” - Prince Philip
It is difficult to believe the aggregate evidence coming out daily but a nice tongue in cheek summary from the Monica Smit telegram group - sums it up for many:
The Philanthropaths have done everything they can short of global genocide to reduce the world's population and some would say they have already started on that dark road already in terms of bio-warfare and gene therapies.
Speaking of dark, the belief in the need for depopulation goes hand in hand with the belief in...
Ideology 4 - Eugenics
We normally think of Eugenics as a dastardly and evil goal of the Nazis. We should indeed quite rightly think so. However, as an idea and indeed a goal, it has not gone away. From the Eugenics Review of 1956 attributed to Frederick Osborn - a then board member of The Population Council.
…we need the greatest number of births among genetically superior individuals. (Frederick Osborn, Eugenics Review 1956) #Eugenics
Isn't it funny how we constantly hear of too many people on the planet and yet the Philanthropaths and their ilk pour money into the goals of genetic engineering and the search for immortality.
Immortality for thee but not for me - not that I'd want such a life sentence. Tell me more about Telomeres - I don't think so.
We are defined by what we do in this life, not by how long we live or how much wealth we accumulate.
Or as Maximus Decimus Meridius once said:
What we do in life, echoes in eternity
Another depressing ideology shared by The Philanthropaths is...
Ideology 5 - Transhumanism
Transhumanism, whilst some of them might contemplate fusion between themselves and machine to become a cyborg, you can bet your bottom dollar the real goal of Transhumanism is to control an unruly populace..
In 2012, Anders Sandberg and Rebecca Roache (from the Future of Humanity Institute, Oxford Martin School), with Matthew Liao (from the Center for Bioethics, New York University), proposed biomedical modifications of humans.
Why would they make such a proposal?
“so that they can mitigate and/or adapt to climate change (presented as less risky option, than for example, geoengineering).”
Yes - good old climate change used as an excuse to further the Transhumanist hell of total human enslavement and subjugation.
This collection of transhumanists also offered up the following great ideas for the reengineering of humans:
1. “Pharmacological meat intolerance” by creating a bovine protein intolerance-inducing meat patch (akin to a nicotine patch) and encouraging people to use such patches.
2. “Making humans smaller” (reducing birth weight and hight) by using hormone therapy or genetic diagnosis and modification before implantation (in this science fiction-like vision it is taken for granted that you visit a fertility clinic to procreate) where you will be given the “liberty-enhancing” choice of having a greater number of smaller children or a smaller number of larger children to meet your allocated greenhouse gas emissions quota, instead of the strict limit of maximum of two children per family suggested by Guillebaud and Hayes.
3. “Lowering birth-rates through cognitive enhancement” by education and cognition enhancement for women, which can lead to them choosing to have fewer children.
4. “Pharmacological enhancement of altruism and empathy” through hormone treatment, in order to make them care more about the environment increase people’s willingness to assist victims of climate change.
5. Other bioengineering possibilities mentioned include “increasing our resistance to heat and tropical diseases”, and “reducing our need for food and water.” - Liao, S. Matthew; Sandberg, Anders; Roache, Rebecca (2012), “Human Engineering and Climate Change”, Ethics, Policy & Environment, Vol. 15, Iss. 2, 2012
And to bring the ethical stance of at least some of the medical and scientific community to your attention, I give you Parker Crutchfield .
Or as the mighty mouse Jikkyleaks put it:
The Brandt-Mengele regime never went away. It just rebranded. This contention violates all medical ethics agreements in existence.
How it was published is beyond me. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30157295/
In other words, he’s talking bollocks.
Climate Change & Global Warming
Professor Carl Sagan was an extraordinary communicator and populariser of Astronomy to the world.
Speaking of extraordinary, Sagan is often remembered for what has now been called "The Sagan Standard"
The Sagan standard is the aphorism "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" (ECREE).
I've always found this at odds with the famous quote from the equally extraordinary communicator Professor Richard P Feynman, what I will call "The Feynman Standard" as a counter:
If it disagrees with experiment, it’s wrong
In that simple statement is the key to science.
It doesn't make a difference how beautiful your guess is, it doesn't make any difference how smart you are who made the guess or what his name is
If it disagrees with experiment, it's wrong. - Professor Richard P Feynman
That tees up the following discussion on climate change nicely.
Yes we do have climate change, the world's weather and geology are in a constant state of flux and mankind during the anthropocene period has been a terrible steward of the environment.
We can indeed control the weather in the short term with cloud seeding technologies for example without us having to go down any H.A.A.R.P. rabbit hole.
The predominant mainstream viewpoint however is we are in a #ClimateCrisis.
Of course, it is in the vested interests of the mainstream media to push the agenda of fear as the old adage "If it bleeds, it leads" has worked since the days of the first newspaper printing presses.
In addition to this, we have the climate cultists and their high profile mouthpieces making declarations such as "The science is settled" or "There is a consensus in the scientific community" or "There is no point debating this any more" etc, etc...
This means those who do put their heads above the parapet to point out the many problems of the current narrative and more importantly the response to the idea of a "Climate Crisis" have been relentlessly vilified.
Narrative dissent, be it climate, electoral fraud, 'vaccine' safety, Digital Identities or 'justified war' is not tolerated....
The current climate change Overton window has been shuttered. There is a small chink of light creeping through and hopefully this post will help bring in further illumination.
I will not go into the various arguments made for what people believe should be done to combat the climate crisis other than to recommend you to the excellent book False Alarm - How Climate Change Panic Cost Us Trillions by Dr Bjorn Lomborg.
He advocates an entirely different set of strategies which crucially will not subjugate the human race nor lead to the deaths of millions or perhaps billions of people and would not waste trillions of dollars, pounds, euros or yen.
Rhetorical question for you: I wonder who would be opposed to the cancellation of spending of trillions of dollars to a set of problems soluble for a pittance in the billions?
So, with that in mind, back to Professor Feynman and his scientific approach to evidence evaluation.
Let's look at why the Climate Crisis is not as pressing as one would be taught to believe.
Let's start with...
Climate Change 97% Consensus
We are constantly told there is a consensus among scientists - we have a climate emergency caused by man.
As the Nobel Laureate Brian Josephson put's it, "Science by consensus" is nothing more than "pathalogical disbelief".
Let's assume for a moment there is indeed such a consensus though - where did this come from?
This figure has been bandied about largely as a result of the paper "Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature" by Cook et al. 2013.
This was a meta analysis in which 11944 climate extracts from 1991 to 2011 were examined.
Sounds impressive - massive sample size.
Well without getting into the problems with statistics (useful as they are, particularly to pummel a populace through fear), this doesn't paint an entirely accurate picture.
Over to you Neil Oliver:
Once again the hammer that is 'the science' is wielded.
Over and over we're told 97 percent of scientists agree the world is made hotter by humans burning fossil fuels.
Less well-known is the fact that number was conjured into being by having a team read the abstracts - which is to say just the front pages - of nearly 12 000 scientific papers dealing with climate change
3896 were judged as blaming humans for the changes
7930 didn't endorse a position
78 exonerated humans altogether and the final 40 were unsure this meant 32.6 of the scientists held humans to blame
Only when the decision was taken to discard, simply to Chuck in the bin the nearly 8000 papers with no position whatsoever was 32.6 magically transformed into 97
what a scam
Manufactured Consensus
And how about the poacher turned gamekeeper - the climate scientist Dr Judith A Curry who's work initially seemed to show that the frequency of Category 4 and Category 5 hurricanes had doubled but when issues were pointed out with the data Judith dug deeper into her own findings and found the critics had a point.
From the New York post article "Climate scientist admits the overwhelming consensus is manufactured" https://nypost.com/2023/08/09/climate-scientist-admits-the-overwhelming-consensus-is-manufactured/ - In her own words, the initial conclusions were wrong because:
“Part of it was bad data. Part of it is natural climate variability.”
In fact, the climate crisis is a "Manufactured Consensus" according to Judith - and indeed others - which permits no debate as per the following from the editor in chief Marcia McNutt of the erstwhile prestigious journal Science:
"The time for debate has ended"
And to wrap up, Judith summarised the state of play in terms of the academic journal review system in general:
“Promote the alarming papers! Don’t even send the other ones out for review. If you wanted to advance in your career, like be at a prestigious university and get a big salary, have big laboratory space, get lots of grant funding, be director of an institute, there was clearly one path to go.”
I'm not sure when Judith was interviewed for this, but it was published on the 9th August 2023.
And what happened on August 30th? Well, climate scientist Patrick T. Brown had his article "Climate warming increases extreme daily wildfire growth risk in California" published.
Brown admitted to omitting pertinent information in order to get his paper published!
Or as Sabine Hossenfelder put it:
"Climate scientist boasts about fudging their own paper".
Sabine currently would not agree with the stance outlined in this post, perhaps she might though upon delving deeply. I hope so, she's a great science communicator and not afraid to admit mistakes:
Dangerous Dissent
Going against the prevailing narrative - no matter the industry or ideology - is a difficult thing to do.
It all but guarantees abuse, ridicule and ostracisation, so why would anyone in their right minds look to upset the apple cart of a prevailing narrative?
Because where a narrative is founded upon hypotheses and theories which do not stand the test of The Feynman Standard, they are not following the scientific method but instead the religious belief that is Scientism.
The dissenting voices within the scientific community are not being heard due to the Censorship Industrial Complex and funding is largely controlled by the NGO Industrial Complex.
So here are just a few dissenting voices to illustrate those who oppose are neither cranks nor as few as the orthodoxy would have you believe:
The aforementioned climate scientist Dr Judith Curry:
Dr Patrick Moore - one of the early founders of Greenpeace: https://wide-awake-media.com/dr-patrick-moore-no-proof-that-co2-is-responsible-for-global-warming/
Dr Freeman Dyson - Theoretical Physicist and Mathematician:
- Dr Ivar Giaever - 1973 Nobel Laureate: https://www.foxnews.com/science/nobel-prize-winning-physicist-resigns-over-global-warming
- Dr John Clauser - 2022 Nobel Laureate:
And what about why have more than 1570 scientists and professionals signed "The World Climate Declaration - THERE IS NO CLIMATE EMERGENCY"
- https://clintel.org/world-climate-declaration/
"Houston, we have a problem with consensus"
Humanity - You are the problem
Remember the Philanthropath mindset and ideologies mentioned previously?
It is not without irony one of the uber climate zealot grifters himself - John Kerry - talks of those who oppose the climate change narrative are part of a cult:
https://twitter.com/thecoastguy/status/1695154798369075215?t=ZWoC-8R0pZaK8TKejSC3sg&s=09
The chilling phrase within his speech which surfaced the dark thinking of the philanthropath mind was thus:
"Humanity is inexorably threatened by humanity itself"
This kind of rhetoric and hyperbole leads to the ostracisation of non-believers, ostracisation leads to othering and othering historically has led to genocide.
Take a look at what Matt Orfalea
had to say about the sadism of the Covid19 shaming campaign:
Gore the bore, Kerry the dingleberry and Trudeau the Turd are 3 prime examples of idealogues who would not be out of place at Nuremberg be the year 1933 or 1946.
Listen to their words carefully, listen to how they espouse "the science" and listen to their absence of listening to any contrarian views.
The Hubris of Humanity
There are various reasons why anthropogenic climate change is likely to be only a small part of any planetary warming.
Milankovitch cycles spring to mind of course.
I could go on, and on, and on with counter arguments and evidence to show we are not in the middle of a man made climate crisis but perhaps you should just take a look at the video "The Great Global Warming Swindle" instead:
or for that matter take a look at this snippet video interviewing Professor Jorgen Peder Steffenson
who spearheaded the NorthGRIP Greenland ice core project.
But before moving off the specific subject of Climate Change there is one theory and some recent observations we really do need to take more seriously.
Or as put by the author himself - The Ethical Skeptic - "The Climate Change Alternative We Ignore At Our Peril". The Ethical Skeptic (or TES as he is known by his folleagues) outlines the very real heat exchange from Earth's core to the crust and beyond.
He entitles this "The Exothermic Core Theory of Climate Change" and if there is one astounding piece of evidence you should let sink in, it is this quote from Jonathan Wille, a researcher studying polar meteorology at Université Grenoble Alpes back in 2018:
It’s 70 degrees warmer than normal in eastern Antarctica. Scientists are flabbergasted
The coldest location on the planet has experienced an episode of warm weather this week unlike any ever observed, with temperatures over the eastern Antarctic ice sheet soaring 50 to 90 degrees above normal. The warmth has smashed records and shocked scientists.
This event is completely unprecedented and upended our expectations about the Antarctic climate system.
~ _Jonathan Wille, a researcher studying polar meteorology at Université Grenoble Alpes see __Durack, Gleckler, et al.__ Dec 2018
And then there was the recent January 2022 Hunga Tonga volcanic explosion:
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1687517106491838465
"Hunga What?" I hear you say. Yes it didn't get a whole lot of attention in the media due to the warp speed news cycle, but it alone can explain a considerable amount of short term increases in global average temperatures.
And remember to measure your own research against The Feynman Standard.
The IPCC and the climate zealots can run around like headless chickens screaming man made crisis at the top of their lungs and talk about Net Zero and limiting global temperature increases to 1.5 degrees centigrade but the hubris of humanity is the inhumanity the proposed solutions will bring to the vast majority of people living on this planet over the next 5 to 10 years.
In the meantime, mother nature will continue to change the climate and like King Canute, foolish efforts espoused will be exposed as futile.
We need common sense thinking but instead we have humanity itself offered up as a sacrifice at the altar of climate scientism zealotry.
We need to look at solutions - and to paraphrase Bjorn Lomborg - which cost billions not trillions; shelter the poor and adapt to an ever changing climate which cannot be controlled at a global level by man-unkind.
Or we could continue to let the powers that be shape the narrative and the response. The terminology has now moved to "Global Boiling" according to the UN Secretary General or as succinctly put by the Fat Emperor himself Ivor Cummins:
Fraudulent UN Globalist Shill now says that the era of Global Boiling" has begun -These guys are insane, and laugh at data/logic/reality - their only goal is to enslave us:
https://twitter.com/FatEmperor/status/1684577762936504321?t=ynMK4OzWjMxfKSwfMoUiqA&s=09
To paraphrase Jessica the dissident homeschooler (@truthervision1316)
Climate Crisis - a made up catastrophe used by globalists to instil fear and guilt so they can tax, regulate and remove freedoms while pretending to save the planet.
We need to remember the famous Charlie Munger quote:
Show me the incentive and I'll show you the outcome.
And steady yourself for even more hyperbole moving forward, don't believe the hype:
Cui Bono?
Ask yourself "Cui bono?" - Who benefits?
Who benefits from sounding the alarm of an alleged man made climate crisis whilst pocketing trillions and furthering the agenda for a one world government and totalitarian control of the world populace?
Could it be the average man, woman or child living on planet earth who are desparately trying to survive in a net zero world hell bent on the misanthropic depopulation of the planet or...
Could it possibly be a different class of people.
Those making millions in a kakistocracy?
Those making billions in a plutocracy?
Those making trillions in a technocracy?
And if you need a little reminder of some of the grifters pushing the narrative, exemplifying hypocrisy and all the while making millions, billions and perhaps trillions, I give you Al 'Inconvenient Bore' Gore, John 'No Private Jet' Kerry and Bill 'The Software Salesman' Gates as hors d'oeuvres:
- Kudos to Wide Awake media for pointing out Al Bore's net worth below:
https://twitter.com/wideawake_media/status/1683834218777038849?t=Arl_sAJI87-z8wjfsuUYiA&s=09
"In this clip from 1992, the world's leading climate grifter, Al Gore - whose climate change alarmism has since amassed him a net worth of over $330 million - gets absolutely schooled"
- Kudos to Bernie Spofforth for pointing out some inconvenient truths on how Al Bore makes his money. Fantastic performance from Al in the video below btw. He may well be a true believing zealot! -
https://twitter.com/BernieSpofforth/status/1683854385019846656?t=k90nVy9lOB7ZBQThpuEntg&s=09
"ENERGY - Did you know that utterly unhinged Al Gore (Climate multimillionaire) is a significant owner in Octopus Energy?
And that Octopus Energy had government backing to take over energy businesses in the crisis?
And they are now investing in off shore wind farms to control renewables in the U.K.?
You do now!... Al Gore's wealth depends on your climate crisis fear.
Follow the money."
- Kudos to Dr Eli David pointing out John Kerry's prediction of an ice free Arctic summer within 5 years back in 2009
https://twitter.com/DrEliDavid/status/1685005007861555200?t=ddV5eYGevHIQPKBc1sGpqA&s=09
John Kerry in 2009: "In 5 years we will have the first ice free Arctic summer"
- Kudos to Kevin of We The People for highlighting the gall and hypocrisy of John 'Private Jet' Kerry:
https://twitter.com/bambkb/status/1680241441782607874?t=dRs_hMfF_zSxLkfsiocyDA&s=09
"Climate goon, John Kerry gets caught lying about his private jet"
Kerry quote: "One of the most outrageously persistent LIES that I hear is this private jet. WE don't own a private jet, I don't own a private jet, I personally have never owned a private jet"
A few moments later...
Rep. Michael Waltz "You just testified under oath that you never owned a private jet. Mr Chairman, I would like too enter an article here from February 15th 2023 that says - The John Kerry Family private jet was sol shortly after accusations of Climate Hypocrisy. Do you still stand by your statement, Mr Secretary?"
Kerry's response "I personally never owned a plane. Yes, my wife did own a plane"
- And kudos once again to Dr Eli David pointing out the guilty pleasure of Bill 'The Software Salesman' Gates-
https://twitter.com/DrEliDavid/status/1683535405063233536?t=SKvbL0pu0fNDGrszTcTB6Q&s=09
Bill Gates says flying on a private jet doesn't make him "part of the problem" because he invests billions into fighting climate change.
In the words of Father Jack in Father Ted:
My Arse!
And if you'd like to see some more of those wonderful people of power and celebrity who are seemingly unconcerned with #TheClimateCrisis - please take a look at ClimateJets.org
Fossil Fuels
Earlier I talked about an energy crisis.
Let's explore this further with the help of Gail Tverberg and her research. I recommend you subscribe to her blog.
In her own bio's words:
We are really dealing with a physics problem that affects many parts of the economy at once, including wages and the financial system. I try to look at the overall problem.
In a recent 2021 presentation - for which I thank Gail for her gracious permission to use parts of - Gail outlines a compelling case for why we are knocking on the door of some dark and dismal times ahead due to our collective response to a perceived crisis.
If you'd like to see Gail deliver the presentation herself, you can view it here: https://web.archive.org/web/20211111013647/https://ksuweb.kennesaw.edu/~bsetzer/stuff/retirees-association-ksu-colloquium-211109.mp4 and download the presentation here: https://ourfiniteworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Gail-Tverberg-Our-Fossil-Fuel-Energy-Predicament-Nov-9.pdf
A Tale of Physics and Economics
Pop quiz, where do you find yourself on the following continuum representing our fossil fuel predicament?
Is it on the left side "Too little easily extractable fossil fuel?" or is it on the right "Too much fossil fuel?"
Of course, media hype and incessant propaganda means the majority of people believe we have too much fossil fuel and we face a bleak future as a result.
The reality is there are two stories at play - the Physics story where there is too little easily extractable oil and we can expect a rapid decline in employment opportunities and goods and services available and then there is the Economics story whereby we have too much fossil fuels and the climate crisis is our most pressing problem.
The Physics story is grounded in the reality of empirical science, the economics story floats in the ether of models of an extrapolated fossil fuel future.
Energy Warnings From The Past
Remember from earlier - the physicist M. King Hubbert forecast a short life span for fossil fuels in his 1956 paper "Nuclear Energy and the Fossil Fuels". Hubbert foresaw a future where fossil fuels had a short shelf life for us to use before depletion.
Hubbert envisaged a world dominated by nuclear energy because in the 50's the technology held great promise - it still does in many ways but the reality is nowhere near enough research, development or investment took place in the nuclear industry to arrive at the nuclear energy hockey stick adoption curve portrayed in the Hubbert paper.
Instead, Hubbert's Peak - widely known as 'Peak Oil' is the more accurate prediction.
Prior to the 2008 uptick in oil production as a result of extraction from unconventional oil sources (using fracking for example), the US had hit peak oil as far back as 1970.
It recently hit new highs in February 2020 only to fall back significantly due to the Pandemic Response crisis. Alas, and hooray for the new extraction technologies for they have bought us some time but at the expense of complacency and of course pollution.
In 1957, Rear Admiral Hyman Rickover in a talk he gave pointed out how high energy consumption is a necessity for a high standard of living. A reduction of per capita energy consumption has invariably led to a decline in civilisation in the past.
Knowing full well the implications of a larger populace, the finite natural resources available on and within the planet, he said:
I suggest that this is a good time to think soberly about our responsibilities to our descendants – those who will ring out the Fossil Fuel Age. - Rear Admiral Hyman Rickover
The Seneca Cliff
In line with The Limits to Growth modelling and thinking, resources available to us on the planet are of a finite nature - and if we bear in mind the telling presentation from[Dr Albert A Bartlett - Arithmetic - Population and Energy, we can see how we are likely approaching "The Seneca Cliff" as coined by Ugo Bardi.
Or as Lucius Annaeus Seneca in 91 BC wrote:
Increases are of sluggish growth but the way to ruin is rapid - Seneca
Even if these models and depictions are wrong, they are an extreme ideological driving force behind the philanthropaths and this mindset equipped with supporting models can allow for unprecedented attacks and actions on the liberties of the common man, woman and child.
Hitherto unconscionable activities and restrictions can be justified - at least in their own eyes - for the common good.
One obvious implication - as raised in Gail's presentation - is with dwindling food resources (as a direct result of a lack of energy), what and who will be prioritised to feed?
With a massively aging population and a reduction in the workforce, it is obvious workers will be prioritised but for the remainder of the populace when asked about the implications, Gail delivered somewhat of an understatement:
It's worrisome...
World Energy Supply
If you listened to the news and politicians, you would be forgiven for thinking the race to #NetZero is going at breakneck speed and the amount of renewable energy sources continues to grow at pace.
The truth is somewhat at odds alas.
Let's take a look at the following chart which shows energy supplies from 1981 through to 2020. The intervening few years will not have substantively changed the slope of the graph however:
The ramp up in intermittent renewables has been going very slowly. Shutdowns in 2020 acted like temporary oil rationing.
And if we look at the change in Global Energy Consumption during this intervening 3 year period, we'll see a near 6% increase in energy consumption in that period alone.
See https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/global-primary-energy
So, assuming renewables still represent some 5% of the total picture, that's a long way short of the remaining 95% and all the while we are inundated with NetZero this and NetZero that and a generous helping of gaslighting in the form of new job creation and no negative changes in our standard of living, instead the polar opposite.
Something smells, and it smells to me of political propaganda.
It is the halitosis of hedonistic habituated hand-shaking, baby kissing, soul destroying, self-serving, gaslighting, high and mighty, vainglorious vote chasing influence peddling whores.
But that's just my opinion - you are free to disagree, please leave a comment below to do so.
The picture for renewable use and adoption is worse though.
The spin constantly rammed down our throats is the need to transition to renewable sources.
This race to the bottom - i.e. NetZero is simply not achievable for a number of reasons, I doubt I have nailed them all here but in aggregation and summary they are devastating to any "Build Back Better Bollocks" the Philanthropaths peddle:
The current figures have been fluffed to look better than they are - the proportion of renewable energy mix appears better than it should be due to a reduction in nuclear energy output and likewise natural gas
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/annual-change-primary-energy-source?time=1966..2022:
The fluffing of energy reporting from Primary Energy consumption to using the 'substitution method' - makes renewables appear better than the actually are.
Variability of supply is invariably glossed over - be it no solar in the Northern Hemisphere during the winter or no hydropower availability in other countries during the dry season
The limitations and lack of battery technology to cater to demand when there is no active renewable supply
The increase of needed energy as population increases.
The extraction costs associated with the raw materials needed for renewables
The transportation costs (both energy and money) associated with wind turbines.
And my penultimate favourite - the assumption there will be enough raw materials available for extraction to win the race to the bottom that is NetZero. The following is a screenshot from an interview between Professor Simon Michaux and Dr Chris Martenson from October 2022. As you can see, based on the rate metals were mined in 2019, the race to get NetZero by for example 2050 - as per UK Government "Build Back Greener" codswallop: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/net-zero-strategy - would mean we'll never get to their promised land of milk and honey. If you chose to ignore some simple facts such as it would take 9,920 years to mine the Lithium needed to produce the first generation of technology units to faze out Fossil Fuels or the 29,113 years needed to extract the requisite Germanium, then I put it to you, you have a germane problem with mathematics and reality
For the full original presentation, please take a look at the fascinating presentation on the Sustainable Minerals Institute UK channel:
And now for my absolute favourite problem to top off all of the previous when it comes to the NetZero renewable race to the bottom. Ask yourself the question - what do heavy mining machinery need in order to carry out their work, often in some very inhospitable and inaccessible parts of the globe without an Electric Vehicle fast charge in sight - yes that's right - they all run on fossil fuels.
In other words
Renewables depend upon Fossil Fuels!!!
So, if we are going to take upwards of 30,000 years to achieve the vision and we have a limited supply of fossil fuels we can extract in the next say 2 decades in order to meet the 2050 Net Zero deadline.
Do you think there might be an alternative explanation for why the mainstream media are promoting a climate crisis and Antonio Guterres is talking about "Climate Boiling"?
And we haven't even talked about the true environmental impact of renewable technologies nor the damage and death visited upon wildlife who come into contact with the turbine blades of death. I'm not sure who made this meme - kudos to them though:
A single wind turbine requires:
45 tons of plastic
900 tons of steel
2500 tons of concrete
To build enough wind turbines to make a difference you would have to do some serious environmental damage
Source: https://www.wsj.com/articles/if-you-want-renewable-energy-get-ready-to-dig-11565045328
We are literally being sold lie after lie after lie.
A great line from Dr Chris Martenson in the video entitled "You are not ready for what is coming" (at 14:10) sums up the current crop of corrupted journalists:
"They are not truth to power investigative journalists, they are now stenographers to power"
And perhaps even more succinctly expressed by my fellow countryman, The Irish Thinker, Talker and Writer John Waters:
who I first heard coin the term "Journaliars".
Fossil Fuel Fare or Foul?
So, we all know the cost of energy for the average household is extortionate and getting worse. Paradoxically however, the price of fossil fuels have not been high enough historically for the level of reinvestment needed to assure a longer term ability to extract and utilise fossil fuels.
According to Gail's analysis, the price of oil needed to be consistently hovering around or due north of the $120 per barrel mark over the last 2 decades at least.
In Gail's analysis, the price disparity between what should have allowed proper reinvestment from the historical record we see is down to economists not understanding the physics of the underpinning system. As Gail said:
Economists believe energy is not needed, just demand - Gail Tverberg
This is no doubt spot on, but i believe there are other factors at play which have caused the problematic price of petroleum over the last few decades.
If we consider the average CEO over the last few decades, they have been driven by the religion of shareholder value. Their fiduciary responsibility has been to provide the best short term realisation on capital invested from their shareholders.
This short-termism mentality not only weakens the company itself - due to the lack of funds available for research, development and inward investment - but also has come home to roost to bring us to the year 2023 when we truly face an energy crisis.
We have - through a combination of misunderstanding and greed arrived at a point in history whereby we collectively stand on the brink of a global Darwin award. This is evidenced by number of bankruptcies in the oil sector over the last 2 decades and our current race to the bottom with the lemming charge of NetZero.
Of course, the other factor which has not been understood by "The Markets" is fossil fuels have never fitted the fabled economics supply and demand price curve:
Energy affects both supply and demand, it is a chicken and egg situation and the likes of the Just Stop Oil movement fail to understand the necessity of fossil fuels in light of our current needs to live. If the protestors were so committed to their ideals and understood the true extent to which fossil fuels are used in their lives, they might want to consider the following course of actions:
Wear no clothes
Eat foraged food only
Drink water from rivers or streams
Shelter in caves
Die from dysentry
Of course, this is not a reasonable way to live nor die.
But if they got their way, and no new oil or gas initiatives were implemented - which is somewhat ironic as given the lack of historic investment, it is happening in reality by default - then we would face a world of catastrophic famine, death and societal collapse, albeit an accelerated collapse faster than the arc we currently seem to be on.
The Physics Based Economy
In a physics based economy - in other words, the real world, not one of faulty models based on unproven economic theories - there are a number of items which need to stay in balance lest the economy fail.
For example,
Producers need a market full of consumers.
The price of goods must be high enough for the producers and low enough for the consumers
The wages of the consumers must be high enough to buy the goods
The producers need sufficient profits to reinvest or they will eventually go out of business
Government systems need enough taxation to fulfil their goals - I'd say commitments but when was the last time your government spent money wisely on commitments to their citizenry?
Supply chains need to hold up
No one company or system should become too large lest it exerts undue control - think Blackrock, Vangard and Statestreet for example
Pollution cannot be too large of a problem
Debt needs to be paid back with interest in order for capital investment to be viable - of course we have come to the a cul-de-sac in this area given the global unsustainable rate of global debt.
Indeed, there is a fascinating series of videos by Professor Richard Werner called "The Case for Abundance":
which explains the fraud we know of as modern economics and the banking system. He dismantles the theories of banking and the beloved Supply and Demand diagram used throughout economics.
The good news is Professor Werner offers solutions to the current economic crises.
The bad news is these solutions will take time to implement given the incumbent corruption and criminality alas.
In short, our current global society is built in reality upon an underpinning Physics-based economy which is hugely complex, interdependent and is as a result a dissipative structure.
It is too big and will fail.
The diagram below from the Gail Tverberg presentation neatly shows the fragility of our global system.
The Physics-based economy: The economy is built up in layers, like a child's building toy. The center is hollow.
What happens when one or more aspects of the current system fails - what will be the second, third, fourth and on order effects?
If we are not careful, a wrong turn could bring us crashing back to an earlier technological age.
Indeed, the Philanthropaths are anticipating a reversion to an earlier type of societal control in the form of feudalism.
Remember - they are cashing out of the fiat driven economy with their most recent transfer of fiat wealth into physical commodities.
It is no surprise Bill 'The Software Salesman' Gates has become the largest private landowner in the United States for example.
I have to laugh at their folly though - if they succeed in their plan for world domination, do they think they will be able to control their inner circle of highly trained security teams to look out for them or is it more likely a mercenary in such a position may hanker to become 'A man who would be king' themselves?
History may not repeat, but it sure does rhyme - Mark Twain
Philanthrocapitalism
So how do and how will The Philanthropaths reach their end-game?
Let's take a look at arguably their most potent economic weapon of influence...
Philanthrocaptilaism - as practiced by the Philanthropaths.
Remember The Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors mentioned earlier.
Well, since it's founding in 2002, it has offered a "Philanthropy Roadmap" which is a "multi-faceted international campaign to engage and educate donors in planning, implementing and maintaining an effective philanthropy programme with a long-term goal of creating a new culture of giving”.
A "new culture of giving" - what does that really translate to: Give, give, give more to ourselves and our influential foundations. Summarised of course by the WEF Mantra "You'll own nothing and you'll be happy".
A little background about this advisory group and the Rockefeller philanthropic endeavours...
> It was a continuation of the efforts orchestrated through the Rockefeller Family Office since 1891. - Source: Rockefeller Archive Center, Rockefeller Philanthropy: A Selected Guide www.rockarch.org/philanthropy/pdf/RockefellerPhilanthropy.pdf (retrieved 21 Jan 2018)
> It rapidly grew to be the largest philanthropy advisory business with 235 full-time employees and 150 clients in 50 countries by 2008 . - Source: Bishop (2008), Philanthrocapitalism: How Giving Can Save the World p. 233
>The family was also deeply involved in the Environmental Grants Association (EGA) which was founded in 1987 by the Rockefeller Family Fund, with a host of large corporations and 250 foundations as members. Source: Environmental Grantmakers Association, Members, ega.org/about/members (retrieved 22 Jan 2018); Center for the Environment (2006), Leadership Fellowship Openings: Environmental Grantmakers Association, June 1–August 31, 2006, New York City, NY www.mtholyoke.edu/proj/cel/fellowship/envirograntmakers.shtml (retrieved 18 May 2022)
>According to an investigation by the US Senate - 2014, Committee on Environment and Public Works, Minority Staff Report, the EGA acted as an important hub for environment-related charity where the donors' activities were coordinated according to the billionaire club's goals. This included the creation of a faux environmental movement aimed at implementing “the low carbon economy. - Source: United States Senate (2014), Committee on Environment and Public Works, Minority Staff Report: “How a Club of Billionaires and Their Foundations Control the Environmental Movement and Obama's EPA”, 30 July 2014
The enormous collective reach across every industry these philanthrocapitalistic foundations wield cannot be underestimated. They shape regulation, legislation and investment across the world. That is their true - but hidden in plain sight - raison d'etre.
These organisations combined are the NGO Industrial Complex.
They are not in the business of giving money away in a charitable fashion, far from it. Many of the biggest foundations in the world are growing larger rather than smaller. It would appear their main function of giving money away is a boomerang business to get more money in return to their donors and funds themselves.
It should come as no surprise to find out how Philanthropath business can offset taxes due and realise huge tax breaks as a result by donating the equivalent to their foundation of choice.
These foundations through their reach and influence ultimately allow even more money to flow back to the main corporations as regulations, legislation and the marketplace itself surreptitiously align to act as a firehouse funnel of future wealth almost as fast as you can say ESG.
Speaking of ESG or now as Larry Fink likes to rebrand it now the ESG game is starting to unravel "Impact Investing" or the more eco-friendly term "Sustainable Investing".
So, tax breaks for the philanthrocapitalist companies, tax breaks for the philanthropaths, engorged coffers for the foundations, engorged coffers for the paid-for-politicians and a future funnel of wealth closing the loop back to the philanthrocapitalist companies.
And the two biggest movers and shakers directly supporting the Philanthrocapitalist agenda are arguably the ones who currently own the world - Blackrock and Vangard.
When you combine the behind the scenes influence of the NGO Industrial complex with that of the Bond villain bravado of Klaus 'We penetrate the cabinets' Schwab and the totalitarian reach the World Health Organisation is currently gunning for.
https://worldcouncilforhealth.substack.com/p/rejecting-monopoly-power-over-global.
It’s not a pretty picture…
Or from a worst case scenario meme on the internet, this is how the new WHO Pandemic treaty may play out if ratified in May 2024 to become a defacto one world government proxy:
1. The WHO declares an emergency.
2. They mandate all citizens in a country or region must be vaccinated.
3. The pandemic declaration gives them control of your governments' resources
4. Your local police and military must enforce the WHO mandates
5. If they refuse, UN troops can be deployed on your soil to round up and forceably vaccinate the population.
Voice from the Past…
The Philanthropaths and their ilk would do well to remember an irrepressible voice from the past...
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." -John F Kennedy
It's not like they are hiding everything from us, reports such as the cheerily entitled "The 12 Risks that threaten Human Civilisation" are rather forthright in pointing us heavily in the direction of problems and coming up with a solution disguised as an opportunistic problem. Namely - "Future Bad Governance".
According to the Global Challenges Foundation, one way of dealing with the problems was to “raise awareness of global, catastrophic risks and accelerate the emergence of a global governance that can handle them.” - thanks to the journaliars and politicians of the world we can say that PR campaign has been a resounding success.
GCF also warned of “future bad global governance" i.e. either failing to solve major problems and instead creating worse outcomes, or the development of a world dictatorship with total surveillance.
Two issues with governance disasters are first, the difficulty of estimating their probability, and second, the dependence of the impact of these disasters on subjective comparative evaluations: it is not impartially obvious how to rank continued poverty and global totalitarianism against billions of casualties or civilisation collapse - https://g20ys.org/upload/auto/4eb9ce315f67d9d94aebf3d90522d5ee3d67a8bf.pdf
In other words, "Govern me harder Daddy, no matter how bad you do it"
As an aside, you have to give it to Dr Anthony Fauci - the man had uncanny knowledge back in 2017 just prior to the Trump inauguration:
"And if there's one message that I want to leave with you today based upon my experience - and you'll see that in a moment - is that there is no question that there will be a challenge to the coming administration in the arena of infectious diseases, both chronic infectious diseases in the sense of already ongoing disease, and we have certainly a large burden of that...
But also there will be a 'surprise' outbreak" - Dr Anthony Fauci
I'm just glad both Fauci and Nancy Pelosi do not play the Powerball or Euromillions lottery - can you imagine how rich they would be with their uncanny knowledge about viral outbreaks and the stock market respectively?
And here we are in 2023 where a slew of Dr's in the medical community are baffled by the continued excess death toll across the globe and particularly the western world.
As outlined by Dr John Campbell:
On a lighter note - for a rather humourous take on Who runs the world, check out this 3 minute video from Toni Bologna:
- big business has never been so energetically epitomised.
Hope
My friend, take a breath from all of the above, it is a lot to take in and may leave you with feelings of anger, angst or perhaps more probably - downright disbelief.
In the Second World War, the allies instituted the Manhattan project - you may very well ask yourself the question "If the world is in such a climate crisis, why hasn't a Manhattan project been implemented?" - well now you of course know the answer:
Why spend billions when you can fleece the world for trillions and assume total control.
But, a new Manhattan project is exactly what we need now. It will not happen though unless enough people know of the problems at hand.
"But what can I do, I am only 1 person" I hear you say. Yes you are - 1 of circa 8 billion. And therein lies the Philanthropaths problems and the path to our salvation.
They may have the money, but we have the numbers.
There is hope. To have gotten this far took courage to face some unpalatable truths. And I promised you at the outset there would be hope provided.
Immediately after publication of this post, another post entitled "The Time for Pertinent Questions and Actions" will be published.
It will provide a free system you can use to instantly maximise your advocacy and action impact at a national level whilst also - more importantly - help you to bring to the attention of others the Philanthropatic problems we face to those you know in your community, be they family, friends, local businesses or community leaders one pertinent question at a time.
It is not meant for adversarial actions. The system comes complete with a database of pertinent questions you can pose and actions you can take but it is meant to be used to spark curiosity in others, not hammer them into submission.
I'm not sure if Peter McGahan was the original author of the following quote but it perfectly sums up the thinking behind the database of questions in the system.
When you seek who is right you have an argument. When you seek what is right you have a discussion. - https://twitter.com/peter_mcgahan/status/1691898772198978037?t=Mqr95OJ6YWeXqRHEymk16Q
Yes, you are just one person, but take heart.
It just takes you to inspire another to question the narrative and they the next and another.
A recent example is the success of the film "The Sound of Freedom" - Hollywood and the machine tried their level best prevent it from being made and it took 5 years to be released post shooting.
It has since been seen by hundreds of millions and take a look at the "Pay if Forward" campaign they ran:
You are just one person - one of 8 billion.
And now you have a choice, carry on going along to get along.
Or take heed of the words of wisdom by from Zuby
https://twitter.com/bambkb/status/1664985540268027904?t=2Ld9Co8c6SEYjcHEtQIvJA&s=09
People say "Oh my gosh, the world is going crazy" and I'm like - it's got here because of your silence.
That's how it got here.
So if you continue to remain silent, if you continue to play games, if you continue to do and say things you know do not make sense or are not right.
Where do you think it's going to be in 5 years, where do you think it is going to be in 10 years?
In fact if you have children, think about the world you want your children to inherit
Do you want your children to grow up in a world where they have less freedom?
No, right?
You want your children to grow up in a world with more liberty, with more prosperity and more opportunity.
And we've seen many times in history what happens when people go along with things that are wrong and unethical.
And so, we need to remember it and have some humility that we are not so much wiser than everyone who came before us, that we're suddenly immune to all of these mental and cognitive flaws or that we're immune to group think or going along with the herd, or that you know, cowardice even.
I think there's a pandemic of cowardice right now.
And I think if everybody could be 10%, 20% more bold and forthright and outspoken in the face of nonsense or in the face of things that are wrong, then we can get right back on a proper trajectory towards more liberty, and more kindness and more tolerance and more human flourishing in general.
Wise words indeed.
If you found this article useful, let your friends, family, neighbours, local business owners, priests, elected representatives know. Send them a simple message: #NowWeKnow - and the link to this article.
Watch out for the next article where your actions can make all the difference:
- "The Time for Pertinent Questions and Actions"
An auspicious day today - as V said in V for Vendetta.
Remember, remember the 5th of November
It is time we remembered.
Now you know what I know, I may be wrong but I'm not confused.
And now my friend, now you have a moral obligation to let others know too…
Subscribe now - you get:
- The entire Obsidian Vault of ProjectBubbleBurst - hundreds of hours of research AND
- The free Obsidian Plugin with accompanying vault/database of ready made Pertinent Questions/Actions so you can make your voice heard to your peers and our politicians!
I was ecstatic to discover your “A Confluence of Philanthropaths” series and just enjoyed the first excellent entry in your video series!
Thank you for linking to Visceral Adventure’s video of my “Anatomy of a Philanthropath” poem.
Below are links to the “Anatomy of a Philanthropath” series where I introduced the term in June 2022:
• “Part 1: A Mostly Peaceful Depopulation” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/anatomy-of-a-philanthropath-dreams)
• “Part 2: Downloadable Digital Dictatorships” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/anatomy-of-a-philanthropath-dreams-947)
• “Part 3: Yuval Noah Harari: Not the Man We Think He Is?” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/anatomy-of-a-philanthropath-dreams-3fd)
I also spoke about philanthropaths during my Corona Investigative Committee presentation shortly after the publication of that series:
• “A Mostly Peaceful Depopulation” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/a-mostly-peaceful-depopulation)
I am thankful to the magnificent Neil Oliver for introducing you to the term and helping to propagate it in his monologues:
• https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/ode-to-a-whistleblower#%C2%A7neil-oliver-used-philanthropath
• https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/i/137255701/neil-oliver-used-philanthropathagain
I'm excited about the series, but there's a high-pitched sound in the background of the 1st video which I can't get past. Can that be cleaned up? Thanks.